A judge looked at possible copyright infringement defenses for Ross Intelligence and said, ‘I reject them all.’ ...

HOW ‘FAIR USE’ WORKS. The fair use doctrine exists to safeguard freedom of expression and to create an environment that ...

LOS ANGELES (AP) — Thomson Reuters has won an early battle in court over the question of fair use in artificial ...

Circuit Judge Stephanos Bibas issued a ruling updating a previous summary judgment decision dismissing copyright infringement allegations made by Westlaw legal research service provider Thomson ...

A judge ruled that a former competitor of Thomson Reuters was not permitted to copy its content to build an AI-based legal platform.

Thomson Reuters has won a major copyright victory as a judge ruled that a competitor using its work to train an AI tool was not fair use.

Yesterday, in the first U.S. ruling on the closely scrutinized question of fair use in the AI-related copyright litigation context, U.S. Circuit ...

In one of the most closely-watched copyright cases this year, a Delaware court rejected defendant, ROSS Intelligence’s (“ROSS”), fair use and ...

The judge rules that replicating human-authored content without permission does not qualify as 'fair use' of AI under ...

AI companies and the copyright owners suing them in dozens of cases across the country got their first glimpse into how judges will weigh fair use arguments Tuesday in a Delaware court’s opinion ...

The case, filed in 2020, accused Ross Intelligence of reproducing materials from Thomson Reuters' Westlaw legal research ...

In the first AI copyright case ruling, a court concludes that training an AI system using copyrighted material isn't fair use. That will likely be cited by creators fighting other tech giants.