Both lawsuits stem from the attorney general's attempt to call into question the results of the 2020 presidential election.

"If organizations know they can engage in this activity and the worst that's going to happen is that they get enjoined, ...

That, of course, is because it can’t," Boyd said. Webster joined in the Paxton statement, adding, "The actions of the State Bar were disgraceful, ridiculous, and a disservice to the people of Texas.

From folk hero Woody Guthrie to a record-breaking Broadway star and a hot sauce magnate… the true story behind every musician ...

the judicial branch’s power is not unlimited," Boyd wrote. "But neither is the executive branch’s power, including that exercised by the attorney general and his assistants." Paxton ...

The state bar sought to take away the law license of Assistant Attorney General Brent Webster over a Texas lawsuit challenging 2020 presidential election results.

Paxton called the case a “witch hunt against ... But the constitutional separation of powers is not one of them,” wrote Justice Jeff Boyd in a dissenting opinion joined by Justice Debra ...

Several justices on the nine-member court appeared skeptical of the attorney general’s claims and expressed religious liberty ...

Rep. Laura Gillen, a first-term Democrat from New York, said she was “proud” to back a bipartisan answer on immigration.