The barring of the involuntary intoxication defense was the basis of Collins' appeal, but Griffiths agreed with Superior Court in an opinion issued Jan. 7.
Instead, Spejcher’s appeal argues that she shouldn’t have been found guilty because her extreme intoxication was not voluntary, and without the voluntary act of becoming intoxicated ...
The court is not precluded from accepting the evidence of a witness who was intoxicated at the time an allegation arose simply because of the witness’ intoxication, the Alberta Court of Appeal has ...
Results that may be inaccessible to you are currently showing.
Hide inaccessible results