Legal experts said there are key differences in Thomson Reuters' case against Ross Intelligence and other major AI-related copyright litigation.

Thomson Reuters has won an early battle in court over the question of fair use in artificial intelligence-related copyright cases.

Thomson Reuters has secured an early legal victory in the ongoing debate over fair use in AI-related copyright cases.

The judge rules that replicating human-authored content without permission does not qualify as 'fair use' of AI under copyright law.

After reconsidering the case, the judge issued a partial summary judgement, which asks whether a non-generative AI system’s content counts as original work.

Following several rightsholder setbacks in copyright actions against AI developers, Thomson Reuters has scored a major “fair use” victory. That important win arrived in the form of a fresh summary judgement ruling from Judge Stephanos Bibas,